News

FDII and GILTI: A Quick Summary

As many taxpayers move past the transition tax and other provisions that needed to be addressed immediately, next on the list are the foreign-derived intangible income deduction (FDII) and the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI).  Despite having similar terms and measurements, these two new laws are actually very different, and this is likely what is causing confusion.

Many scholars and articles have deemed the interaction of GILTI and FDII as a carrot and stick approach to tax reform.  This is a good way to conceptualize the interplay, as these two provisions work in tandem to encourage operations from the U.S. and discourage earning intangible income through a foreign subsidiary.  However, one major difference is that GILTI applies to any U.S. shareholder, while FDII only applies to C corporations.

The Carrot – FDII

Under FDII, a benefit is given for income that is deemed to be generated using foreign intangibles.  This is not based on the actual income generating of an intangible but rather it is backed into through a complex formula comparing foreign sourced income to the U.S. asset base.  The benefit is that if the income qualifies, it can enjoy a lower tax rate on this income through a deduction.  The incentive here is for U.S. C corporations to conduct their global business from the U.S.

The Stick – GILTI

We have received many calls with taxpayers asking, “if they can use GILTI.”  GILTI is not a benefit, it is a deemed income inclusion when certain foreign income is earned through intangibles by a foreign subsidiary, similar to Subpart F.  Therefore, you do not want GILTI.  GILTI is to discourage earning intangible income through a controlled foreign corporation by imputing current taxable income.  Without this inclusion, the foreign earned intangible income of the subsidiary would not be taxable in the U.S. until it was repatriated, or possibly never if it qualified for the participation exemption.

In the future, we will dive into these topics in more depth, but it is very important to understand the differences.  Overall, both provisions fit the standard format for U.S. international tax law; encourage investment into the U.S. and discourage investment out of the U.S.

Disclaimer: Hone Maxwell LLP articles and blogs are not intended as legal advice. Additional facts, facts specific to your situation or future developments may affect subjects contained herein. Seek the advice of an attorney before acting or relying upon any information herein.

Latest Post

SAN FRANCISCO

870 Market St., Suite 588
San Francisco, CA 94102
415.765.1754

SAN DIEGO 

3465 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92108
619.980.4476

IRVINE

4 Venture, Suite 320
Irvine, CA 92618
949.838.7807

TIJUANA

Centro Corporativo Dayco
Blvd. General Gustavo Salinas #11050
Suite 602, Col. Aviacion
22014 Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
+52 (664) 504 6415

Newsletter Signup

Stay updated on the latest tax laws.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.